Caspar Connolly, Anonymous tree, 2024, polylactic acid, sand, ink, fibreboard, aluminum, stainless steel, wax, flashe vynal, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, pine, cyanoacrylate, glass, 184 x 231 x 85cm

The simplicities of sculpture, as this work retells, can be traced back to the paragon in pictura poesis. These Latin phrases have long been used to argue the privileges of sculpture over poetry; that is, the fundamentals of seeing over listening. Embracing the long tradition of pictura poesis and its notion of ‘speaking statues’, as seen with works like Laocoön and His Sons, sculpture’s symphony is the distinct separation between the art of images and words. Object purity is hard to come across in contemporary sculpture, and, with the advent of found objects, a simple structure of imitation can get lost in translation. This leads me to believe that the blurred lines in Horace’s Ars Poetica, more specifically, the lines between object, sculpture, statue and artwork, get in the way of analysing three-dimensional works.  

Although sculptures grow all around us, Caspar Connolly has isolated the association of the tree to the inside of TCB Gallery. Anonymous tree consists of two sculptures on either end of Gallery One; the tree towards the opening of the room and a perched wasp tucked around the corner. Walking around the room, I find myself ducking under and around the protruding branches, protecting the delicate foliage from those with large bags and oblivious bodies. I stand up straight to observe the tree, which is taller and skinnier than me. On the other end of the room is a repurposed cardboard box with Caspar’s name sharpied onto the side. On top of the box is a maximised blue insect, which is quite innocent at first glance, with its long antennae perked up and letters stuck to the end of each leg. Walking over to it, I crouch down to the level of the work.


The practicality of this sculptural show is ambiguous. Not to say that it has to have a practical use, just that usually sculptural forms insinuate some form of operation other than the notion of replica. Conceptual artists such as Giseuppe Penone, Petr Štembera and Andre Cadere have previously expanded on the use of trees beyond their functions and focused solely on their form, just as Caspar has done in the first sculpture. This, in a way, presents a purer form of sculpting, one that simply admires the stability of a structure instead of its purposes or promises. Herein lies the importance of rootage, something that evolution has perfected and what has allowed the tallest trees in the Rockefeller Forest to grow. Growing under TCB’s floor, throughout the Bunnings carpark and onto Sydney Road are branches of science and family histories. Concealed under a brown perspex box, the tree’s roots are a proliferation of ideas. Just like this object’s foundations, a human being is rooted through their genuine, active, and natural involvement in the cherished traditions of the past.

Under the fluorescent gallery lights, the chlorophyll of each leaf has been drained to reveal a crusty truth. Encrypted on each leaf are the overlapping histories of time and place, brand logos, numbers, scribbles and pictures, pulled and pushed as if distortion is the only way to conceal their secrets. Their round edges suggest that these are variations of fig leaves, deformed to breed a new species of fig, one that is altered by its placement in the gallery. Pale pink, beige and grey leaves click into place at the end of each branch. Some face towards me, while others are turned up and curled down. A few leaves rest on the floor, shedding in time for Melbourne’s winter. After examining one leaf in particular, I realise I cannot decode the objects, as Caspar has constructed a language through which to read the work as a whole. Enlaced with voyages into family history, the ode is the most vital part in Anonymous tree. Prioritising subtle homages over representation is key to understanding what the show wants to tell us. This brings us back to the myths and legends surrounding sculpture in ancient Greece. As Wincklemann believes, “connoisseurs and imitators find not only nature at its most beautiful but also something beyond nature, namely certain ideal forms of its beauty, which… come from images created by the mind alone.” With works such as Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne (1622-1625), the interpretation of Ovid’s Metamorphoses in which Daphne turns into a laurel tree is gracefully captured by Bernini mid-movement. With the changing of seasons, Caspar’s work also transforms to reveal the skeletal underlay of trees. 

Anonymous tree reminds me of the primal use of human hands. While Caspar has previously used sand casting to create moulds and bake forms, the introduction of 3D modelling and printing allowed him to extend his primal sculpting fingers to the inside of the computer screen. The gritted coating on each leaf mimics half buried archaeological digs, warped and melted overtime after centuries of hot and cold changes. Concealed underground, Caspar resurfaces these antiquities to decorate the tree. He then decorates the decorations themselves, glueing shiny jewels and trinkets onto the sandy leaves. The trunk is constructed out of stacked logs, each one harbouring its own story. Erected proudly, every blocked section of the trunk is dipped in an image, with some resembling bark and others fabricated patterns, again designed to ornate the tree. These multilayered skins are formulaic to Caspar’s language - they are reproducible, same as the 3D models - but the precarious restrictions of sand casting reveal the unique ways an object can manifest.


This tree is one addition to a long lasting practice of Caspar’s, where he considers his position in the world, in his family, across the seas and locally. Anonymous rree represents a timestamp of process-

based sculpture, practised socially. There is a strong inclination towards the noble grandeur of this upright shape, and most importantly, the inconclusive findings of the tree's markings. Anonymity, as the title proposes, touches on the mode of concealment and variations of texture throughout this show. The choice of textual permanence, just like object permanence and the feeling of something that isn’t present, is used to focus on the form of the tree. The muscle memory of a root system encapsulates the simple traditions of sculpture. With my face lost in the canopy, I experience crown shyness amongst Anonymous tree.


Margarita Kontev

Anonymous Sculpture

It was in the crumbling ruins of a house that we found a fig tree, forgotten, covered in ripe fruit which we ate until the purple had run down our fingers and stained our wrists. What she gifted me then was the smell of the leaves. Pick one. Avoid the white latexy milk that spills out the bud where it broke. It’s not there at first, what you want, just the same green smell of every leaf, chlorophyll, verdant, volatile leaf aldehydes. Let it begin to dry, for the leaf to lose its firmness, the edges to curl up. This is enough time to walk down a street in the sun. You almost forget about it, until you smell it again. Which for a while, in the time when I met Caspar, I said was the most beautiful thing I’d ever smelt.


For Caspar, later, it was an island in the Mediterranean, where he’d gone to search for a family trace. The house was a ruin, or it was intact, or it was the wrong house, since no one spoke English. He felt a little lost, by the bright sun, unsure what he’d hoped he would find. He remembers how the cicadas screamed, all from the same tree, let’s say for this story, the only tree there, a fig tree, which had surpassed the little square where it had grown. How he had gone there looking for an identity, a Greek lineage, which he had hoped to place in his body if he could stand where it started, and yet, and yet. There was a tree that screamed, and he picked a leaf.


Which later you realise there isn’t such a thing as the most beautiful thing you’ve ever smelt. You can not remember smells, especially not a fig leaf, a smell that can’t be extracted. It’s too delicate, its essential components break down in suspension, and the green sweetness is gone. Perfumers who want to present a fig leaf have to synthesise it, which means, they have to build it out of other components, the green smell of tomato leaf, the sweetness of a synthetic ester. So how do I come to the tree on the island where Caspar stood? I can not. His tree in the gallery has been synthesised, from a thermoplastic, polylactic acid, from silica, a digital haze.


Conceptually, Caspar would say, the most stable part of the work is that it’s a tree, and he likes that. If in the last months you asked him what he’s been up to he would say that he took a semester off school to make a tree for a gallery. But in those days when I met him, he carried in his pocket, in zipped up pencases, in tin containers scattered around his workshop, a collection of plastic and metal and ceramic scraps. Little bits of flotsam he’d gathered on the street and the beach, wood chips, shattered shells, or conical aquamarine chunks of glass. Detritus, which really means, things that have worn away. Often this is what got to him first, the mystery of where they’d worn away from. Helical puzzle pieces, shot forth across his path. He cast what he found in plaster.


Somehow, after he abandoned sculpture, or sculpture abandoned him, he returned to his first practice, drawing. This was before the fig tree in Greece, though trees appeared in his drawings. Simplified, not so much the drawing of a tree as the drawing of the symbol of a drawing of a tree. Basically broccoli, three or four overlapped half-circles, and a thick stem. But the fig tree on the island made him want to make leaves, ones he could hold in his hands, so he started to draw them in his computer. Each leaf is a canvas for a drawing. Or how it turned out that sculpture had never left. Still gleaning, the leaves are modelled from symbols he finds, on the streets, in model libraries, words or edifices, logos and tokens.


But Caspar wouldn’t want me to say any of this. For him the tree is his first work, an anonymous tree, that isn’t him. Not a work of identity, but its opposite, a tree that erases him. It isn’t even the tree on the island, it is just here, in this room with you, artificial, erect, the leaves in soft curves warped around sand in the oven. Heat that softens, the opposite of the water that used to harden his plaster tablets. As though he wants to come at what he was from upside down.


Which, after we broke up, us with our stained wrists, the smell of fig leaves took on a new significance.


I’m writing to you from a village in Europe, because I wanted to give up everything I knew. That the fig trees I walk past here, with their green fruit already swelling here on the shoulder before summer, are the same common fig that grew in the back of the garden of the house I shared with her in Melbourne. Someone else said, you can eat them, fig leaves, and sunk them into the broth. You must try it. But I am too far away. I will not see Caspar’s tree, which isn’t his, as it stands in the gallery. I wonder, does it have an odor, the polylactic acid made from cornstarch, a delicately sweet smell?


By Trevor Louw

To request a catalog of available works please click Email this tree.

Thanks to TCB art inc, Texts by Trevor Louw and Margarita Kontev, Melbourne Urban Forest, Website design by Sacha Lovell, 'documentation by Nicholas Mahady', Poster by Jack Hewitt, Kathleen Syme Library, Library On The Dock, narrm ngarrgu Makerspace, NextLab, FabLab, Charlie Robert, Thomas Kent, Claudia Van Eeden, iNaturalist.